Wednesday, April 13, 2011

What’s in your diet soda: the health risks of aspartame

wcfoodies:

In 1965, a chemist at G.D. Searle & Co discovered aspartame. By 1981, aspartame was approved by the FDA and for sale under Searle’s trademarked brand name, NutraSweet. On aspartame’s shoulders, an entirely new arm of the food and drink industry was born: the calorie-free-sweetener ‘diet’ market.

In 1980 - a year before the FDA approved NutraSweet, and its active ingredient, aspartame - an internal Board of Inquiry composed of three independent scientists confirmed that aspartame “might induce brain tumors.” In fact, as far back as 1971, Neuroscientist Dr. John Olney found that one of the key ingredients of aspartame caused holes in the brains of infant mice. A Seale researcher confirmed Dr. Olney’s foundings in a follow-up study. In 1977, the FDA formally undertook a criminal investigation of Searle with the U.S. Attorney’s office to investigate if Searle had knowingly misrepresented findings and “conceal[ed] material facts and ma[de] false statements” in aspartame safety tests. It was the first criminal investigation the FDA had ever filed, but it went nowhere.

Finally, in 1981, Searle CEO Donald Rumsfeld brashly stated that he would use his vast political influence - not science - to get aspartame FDA approval.

A few years later, the General Accounting Office issued a report (pdf) about the FDA’s approval of aspartame. The report showed that many of the scientists polled about aspartame’s safety disagreed with the FDA on issues of aspartame’s safety and felt that it needed further research, specifically in

[the areas of] neurological function, brain tumors, seizures, headaches, and adverse effects on children and pregnant women.

The result was that research continued in all areas - except for brain tumors.

Then, in 1996, 84 of 92 independently-backed peer-review studies of aspartame found bad health effects resulting from aspartame.

Finally, in 2006, the Italian Ramazzini Institute published a study that showed aspartame might be a possible carcinogen: they tested aspartame on 1,900 rats for the full (roughly 3 year) course of the rats’ lifetimes. Previous studies had only been conducted on much, much tinier rat pools and only for 1-2 years. The rats tested in the shorter studies didn’t show an increased susceptibility to cancer while taking aspartame. This is significant because cancer, generally and largely, manifests itself later in life: after the age of 55. 2-year-old rats are roughly 53 in human years, so the Searle-funded studies were essentially ending the experiments before potential cancers could be observed in the rats. In 2010, Ramazzini repeated their aspartame tests on mice (pdf) and found that aspartame, even in small doses over the course of the mouse lifecycle

induce[d] cancer of the liver and lungs.

So, just to recap:

  • Searle’s aspartame, now a vital part of a billion-dollar industry, has been linked to increased incidents of liver and lung cancer in lab animals, including in animals that took aspartame prenatally; 
  • Research on aspartame’s relationship to brain tumors has been cut short, despite the cautioning of many scientists;
  • Research funded by Searle consistently and regularly found aspartame to be a safe additive, while independently-funded research regularly found otherwise;

Oh, and:

Just for fun:

Aspartame is bad. It may increase your risk of many cancers. There’s evidence that it heightens the risk of strokes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. And we don’t know if it causes brain tumors or not because research in that area was halted decades ago.

Who’s thirsty now?

h/t Tom Philpott, Just how bad is aspartame? Grist, 2/14/2011

Note to self: kick the Diet Pepsi habit. 

Notes

  1. melancholeria reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  2. inspiritk reblogged this from wcfoodies
  3. lazybeautiful reblogged this from robot-heart-politics and added:
    why is everything that i love and hold dear to my heart going to kill me? now i have to give up diet coke too?!...
  4. alt0220 reblogged this from caraobrien and added:
    originals are always better than
  5. hairtrending reblogged this from bluntlyblue
  6. bluntlyblue reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  7. karmajesus reblogged this from caraobrien
  8. offwithitshead reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  9. germaican reblogged this from robot-heart-politics and added:
    I’m glad I quit drinking soda… one month now!
  10. hanket-blog reblogged this from caraobrien
  11. mirandadaniel reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  12. crazysunshine reblogged this from schlap and added:
    If this doesn’t convince you...diet soda habit, I
  13. eatmynarcolepsy reblogged this from caraobrien
  14. roureynolds reblogged this from bob-ombadillo and added:
    well actually if you eat like 25,000 packets you will die thank chem class LD50s
  15. schlap reblogged this from caraobrien and added:
    This is why I never eat anything sugar free or light or diet. They are really bad for you. Regular Mexican Coke always...
  16. huhnnydew reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  17. zenwerewolf reblogged this from caraobrien
  18. bob-ombadillo reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  19. caraobrien reblogged this from robot-heart-politics and added:
    Note to self: kick the Diet Pepsi habit.
  20. robot-heart-politics reblogged this from wcfoodies
  21. jhsat reblogged this from kevin and added:
    MONSANTO IS THE ANTICHRIST!
  22. jenninsandiego reblogged this from wcfoodies
  23. ohmygrasya reblogged this from wcfoodies
  24. kelseyl reblogged this from kevin and added:
    eat anything with aspartame. Also, it tastes DISGUSTING.
Google Analytics Alternative